Monday, May 5, 2008

Credit Crunch Puts Squeeze on Specialized Mortgages

While the fact is that this is a buyer's market and a great time, especially, to invest in housing in Las Vegas, it is no fiction that lending has changed due to recent downturns and challenges in the banking industry. The LA Times had a great article yesterday discussing ways in which mortgages have changed in the past couple of years.

Highlights:


In a move scheduled to take effect for all loans delivered after Aug. 8, Freddie Mac will restrict financing to second-home and investment purchasers who already have "individual or joint ownership" interests in multiple properties. In the case of second-home buyers, they will be ineligible for new mortgages through Freddie if they have ownership interests in more than four properties securing debt, including the one they propose to finance.


Why the continuing rollbacks, and how long could they continue? Lenders and insurers are carefully studying the sources of their greatest losses from mortgage vintages between 2003 and 2007. In the areas where they see inordinate risk, they are reacting by eradicating that risk. Some of those high-loss loan products -- mass-marketed option ARMs with minimal down payments and "stated" incomes, for instance -- probably never will be seen again. Others are likely to return only with tougher underwriting standards and higher fees tied to credit and geographic risks.

DON'T OVERPAY... FILE A PROPERTY TAX APPEAL

Property taxes seem to jump up year after year. Unfortunately, we've become so accustomed to rising taxes that it's no longer a surprise. But here's something that may surprise you. Did you know that over the last eight years, property taxes have actually outpaced even inflation? Those rising taxes - combined with the recent plateau in home values in some areas - mean you may be paying more than your fair share.

In fact, the National Taxpayers Union estimated that as many as 60% of home values were assessed too high, resulting in an incorrectly larger property tax bill.

Based on recent market activity and the rising property taxes across the country, there's a chance you may be in the group of people paying too much. In fact, homeowners in declining markets are receiving solicitations from companies that charge up to $250 to help lower property taxes. But with the steps below, you can work with your local County Assessor to lower property taxes for free...and save yourself the $250!

The good news: it's easy.

First, contact your local tax assessor's office and ask for someone in the reassessment area. Find out when appeals are heard, and how the process for submitting a property tax appeal works.
Additionally, ask for a copy of your property card. Review the card and confirm that the basic information about your property is correct. For example, is the square footage and number of rooms for your home accurate? If the number is incorrect, the county may change the assessment without a formal appeal. If everything on the property card is correct but the assessed value still seems too high, your next step is to gather the following documentation to support an appeal. And don't be surprised if the assessed value is lower than what you think the market value for your home is--many counties use a formula which uses a percentage of market value to determine assessed value. Ask what the formula is... because an assessment that is less than market value still might be too high.

If you have a current appraisal that supports the value being lower using recent market-value information, many counties will accept a copy of the appraisal with the appeal. If the appraisal is outdated, you can order a new one--just call me for a referral to a great appraiser. You can also visit the local assessor's office or search online, and look through the public records for other homes that have similar features to yours, but have lower assessments. They will be able to give you current market information for your neighborhood, and help you see how your market value and assessed value stacks up against your neighbors.

Submitting an appeal is generally a fairly simple process, but make sure to take the time to fill out all forms in advance and be prepared with your documentation if there is an in-person hearing that needs to take place.

More good news...

According to the National Taxpayers Union, about 33% of property tax appeals succeed! Taking the time to review the accuracy of a tax bill could easily save you hundreds of dollars per year, adding up to thousands of dollars during the time you own your home.

Thanks to Paula Clark for this valuable information

Thursday, May 1, 2008

NAHB Testifies before US House Committee

United States House Small Business Committee Subcommittee on Finance and Tax Hearing On
“The Effect of the Credit Crunch on Small Business Access to Capital”


Scott Eckstein testified yesterday (April 30, 2008), on behalf of the National Association of Home Builders, before a U.S. House of Representatives committee looking at the current credit situation and its effect on the smaller home builders across the country.

Their recommendations to the committee have implications for all real estate investors. Here are some highlights:


Broader Sources of AD&C Credit (acquisition, development and construction)

The current financing quagmire for home builders vividly illustrates the importance of developing additional sources of AD&C credit. ... A viable secondary market for AD&C loans would directly benefit builders and lenders by: (1) transferring risk away from lenders; (2) increasing availability of funds so that projects can be
more reliably completed; and (3) mitigating the devastating impact of equity calls on builders, or transfers of partially completed projects to banks under capital and/or regulatory pressure.

Balanced Regulation

The approach of the regulators in overseeing institutions involved in AD&C lending will be an important factor determining the length and severity of the current housing and economic recession as well as the vigor of the subsequent recovery. It is crucial for the banking regulators to take a balanced approach when evaluating bank lending, especially in regard to AD&C loans. The regulators should continue to encourage institutions to pursue sound loans on viable projects. In addition, the regulators should provide additional guidance to lenders on dealing with outstanding
AD&C loans to ensure that losses are minimized through flexible and prudent loan accommodations. Such actions are just as critical in a nascent recovery as in the current downswing.


Federal Home Loan Bank Guarantees of Municipal Bonds

S. 1963, introduced in the Senate by Senators Rockefeller, Crapo, Stabenow and Carper, would address this impediment. The bill would amend Section 149(b) of the Internal Revenue Code by adding FHLBanks to the list of government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) authorized to provide credit enhancement for tax-exempt municipal bonds. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have been permitted since 1984 to provide such credit support. A similar provision was included in the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 (H.R. 5720) that was recently approved by the House Ways and Means Committee. Enactment of this measure would help to significantly lower financing costs on public infrastructure and other projects that are the foundation for meeting community housing and economic development needs.


Home Buyer Tax Credit

Two causal factors in the current housing downturn and the related credit crunch are
declining house prices and excess inventory. These elements are equally central to the outlook for the broader economy and the financial markets. Policies that stimulate home purchases in the immediate future can pay huge dividends. The biggest bang for the buck most likely would be provided by a temporary homebuyer tax credit, such as the credits approved recently by the Senate in the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 and by the House Ways and Means Committee in the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008. Indeed, the recent revival of interest among prospective buyers suggests that temporary credits could stimulate a wave of home buying that could quickly reduce excess supply in housing markets and halt the dangerous erosion of house prices and mortgage credit quality. NAHB applauds the Congress for its efforts to create a homebuyer tax credit, and stand ready to work with Congress in crafting the most effective credit to help solve the current economic crisis.

Expand the Net Operating Loss Deduction Carryback

Home builders, like many businesses, are now reporting financial losses when a few years ago they were generating jobs, providing local development and paying taxes. For home builders large and small the importance of the ability to claim and carry back net operating losses (NOL) deductions to years when significant taxes were paid cannot be overstated. The inability to do so will result in the need to either increase high-cost borrowing or further liquidate land and homes, which
will only compound the existing inventory problem.

Expand the Mortgage Revenue Bond Program

The existing Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) program also offers a method of increasing
housing demand. A special allocation of bonds to be used for either purchase or refinancing would be beneficial for housing.

Expand Small Business Expensing

Section 179 of the tax code allows small business to expense the cost of investment for business property. The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 temporarily expanded the rules so that small businesses may expense up to $250,000 of qualified investment for tax year 2008 ($128,000 would have otherwise applied in 2008, with that amount indexed for inflation through 2011). The expensing benefit is phased-out for business incurring more than $800,000 in qualified investments in 2008 ($510,000 would have otherwise applied in 2008, with that amount indexed for inflation
through 2011).



Click Here if you want more information on this committee and its work.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

From Doom and Gloom to Make Room for the Boom

Mark Twain once penned: “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” A half-truth probably goes even faster.

It seems almost daily we hear that foreclosure rates are soaring throughout the country as the effects of shifts in both housing and mortgage industries continue to be felt. But if you dig deeper than the headlines and sound bites, you might find that another phrase attributed Mark Twain would be even more appropriate: Reports of the demise of the housing industry are greatly exaggerated.

In order to understand how exaggerated, we need to understand exactly where such reports originate.

Most media reporters rely upon RealtyTrac, a real estate data aggregator that regularly reports various numbers relevant to the housing industry. RealtyTrac data is accessible and seemingly straightforward.

Data, however, are only as good as the methods used to collect them. And there’s where the problem begins. Housing data is usually collected at the county level. Specifically, foreclosures follow a procedure that requires filing paperwork with the county recording offices. There is no single system or procedure followed by each county. There are 3,140 counties in the United States and almost as many procedures which have to be followed in order to foreclose on a single property.
Also adding to the problem is that most foreclosures involve more than one bank, so in addition to multiple filings due to different steps in the foreclosure process, there may be up to as many as 5 entities making those filings, including HOA’s, 2nd, 3rd, & 4th lien-holders. It should be noted that, in some neighborhoods, there can be as many as 3 Home Owners’ Associations for a single unit.

In addition to requiring different filing procedures, which can include multiple “filings” for a single property, counties track their filings differently. Many are automated and digital, but many are still pretty much a paper, copy machine and microfiche. This means that one county might have real-time data, where another country might not be reporting their filings for 3 to 6 months after they are made.
The upshot of all this is that gaining a clear picture of exactly how many properties are really foreclosed is not as easy as it might seem at first. Up until late 2007, RealtyTrac was using the number of filings to count foreclosures. When they started using property addresses as part of their data collection, the effect was to reduce foreclosure counts by 20-30%. In other words, for most of 2007, the foreclosure rates that were reported in the media were inflated by at least 20-30%.
But even after adjusting for the multiple filings per property, the numbers are exaggerated. Foreclosures take time. The process can take 90 to 120 days. During that time, things can happen, including a buyer might be found. So some filings can be made that never end in a foreclosure.

RealtyTrac is reporting the number of properties on which foreclosure proceedings have begun, not the number of properties that are foreclosed.
Of course, none of this makes glamorous or sexy headlines. Doom and gloom sell papers and raise ratings. With the advent of the Internet, media outlets face a competitive market like they have never seen and content has been sacrificed for sensation. So rather than responsibly digging into the deeper story and helping consumers understand what different numbers really mean, many (not all) media reports remain negative.

This is why the savvy investor doesn’t pay attention to the headlines. According to Andrew Waite, in the January-February 2008 issue of Personal Real Estate Investor, the picture is not nearly as bleak as one might guess from the local evening news in your hometown. After examining the data and the ways in which the data is collected and counted, Waite asserts that as of 12/06/07, .078% of all homes in the U.S. had gone into “absolute foreclosure” in 2007. Less than 1%. Hardly a horrific crisis.
So if the data on foreclosures is difficult to follow and often reported poorly, what can the savvy Real Estate Investor do to understand when is a good time to invest and when is a good time to sell?

Probably the most important statistic to watch is population growth. The relationship between housing and population is an obvious and natural one. Currently in Clark County, we have a housing glut. This is due to many factors, including the recent shifts to stricter mortgage qualification requirements, the rise of bank-owned properties and fear-mongering that misleads both buyers and sellers from following more rational courses in pricing and buying/selling decisions.

These factors will adjust under the pressure of the coming population growth.

“The only action necessary to change the market is to change our expectations. We have been and will most likely remain the envy of the country for one reason alone … we create jobs. Employment is the engine that drives the economy and for the past 20 years or so, we’ve had the most powerful engine in the race.” – Patrick Egger, Understanding the Las Vegas Marketplace

Las Vegas is growing and is expected to grow by 50% in the next 12 years. This means the demand for housing will be huge. The current glut, and its suppression of prices, will not last.

Doom and gloom may sell papers and raise ratings, but when considering an investment like real estate, facts are more likely to increase profits than rumors.
Understanding a local market requires a local source of knowledge. The role of the local Realtor® can be much more valuable than the local newscaster. Our jobs as Realtors® are to keep abreast of the local economy neighborhood by neighborhood.

The Dulcie Crawford Group has accumulated a lot of knowledge about local economies and we are keeping up with the many changes current conditions are creating. Please feel free to ask us anything that will help you better understand how to reach your goals in the current market. We will be happy to help.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

FIRST SEMINAR A SUCCESS!

Our thanks to the participants who came our first seminar, Where Should I Invest in 2008? held last Saturday at Windermere. We had a great turn out and a great discussion.

A special thanks to tax attorney, Jim Sexton, who reviewed the tax benefits of rental investments with a special eye for the current market.

Also, a special thanks to Eric Torres whose impromptu information on securing financing for rentals which greatly enhanced our discussion.

Look for more seminars soon. If you'd like to be notified of future seminars, please email us at Dulcie@DulcieCrawford.com and we'd be happy to put you on our mailing list. OR stay tuned for announcements right here!

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Las Vegas Real Estate Market is Starting to Warm Up

The Las Vegas Board of Realtors (MLS) reported that, as of April 15, 2008 there were approximately 21,971 home listings throughout the greater Las Vegas valley, which includes the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson. This figure, one of the lowest numbers of monthly listings reported in the past year, is the result of the overall increase in pending and contingent transactions, now reported to be approximately 5,301.

Based on the current rate of monthly sales, this translates into about an 8-month supply of inventory, a definite improvement over any period in 2007, during which typical supply averaged about 20 months. This change represents a buyer increase of approximately 140% over similar periods in 2007 and is considered a good market indicator that the bottom has or will arrive soon.

If you take 2007 figures we averaged 1,077 sales per month. In 2008, over the first three and a half months we are averaging 1,393 sales per month which is an increase in sold properties of 29%, which is another indication that the market is improving. Furthermore, multiple offers on foreclosures are being reported, another good sign that buyers believe we are at or close to a market bottom.

The general market softened over the past 1.5 years due to the oversupply of available inventory and diminishing demand. This softening was the direct result of unrealistic sellers, a large portion of which were investors, and the lessening of credit programs formally available. In a typical market, if a property is priced appropriately, it will sell within a reasonable period of time. In a soft market, however, sellers have a tendency to be very unrealistic in pricing in order to minimize losses.

They do not take into consideration the dynamics of supply and demand.

Builders in the city believe that a full market correction will occur sometime in 2009. In adjusting to the downturn, they have lowered prices by 20%-30%, have less standing inventory and are constructing homes on an "as needed" basis. Its hard to imagine our local housing market will not right itself and come into balance, given the over $35 billion dollars worth of construction taking place on the Las Vegas "Strip." To date, approximately 6,000 people continue to move to the Las Vegas valley every month. This can only lead to an ever-increasing demand for housing. In their reluctance to buy, the ongoing major concern of buyers is whether or not we are truly at the end of a declining market.

Thanks to Paula Clark for this information.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Where Should I Invest in 2008?


SEATS ARE GOING FAST! BE SURE TO RSVP BY THURSDAY, APRIL 17TH!*

THE DULCIE CRAWFORD GROUP PRESENTS

Where Should I Invest in 2008?
Tax Advantages of Real Estate Investments
in Today's New Market


Speakers:
James Sexton, Tax Attorney
Esquire Group

Dulcie Crawford, Realtor®
Windermere Prestige Properties

Saturday, April 19, 2008
10AM to Noon

2200 Paseo Verde Parkway
Suite 160
Main Conference Room
Henderson, NV 89052

Limited Seating
RSVP 702-432-4600, Pattie Thomas, Marketing Coordinator
OR
Email: Dulcie@DulcieCrawford.com
BY Thursday, April 17


"Las Vegas, Nevada: Yes, Las Vegas has been hit hard by incoming investors, who watched their home values disappear and then left those homes empty. Las Vegas comes in quite high on the national foreclosure list, almost always within the top three metro areas. But there's an upside--a very strong job market. In 2007, Las Vegas experienced a 12 percent increase in population, partly driven by retirees looking for Sunbelt states to move to. Coupled with low prices, we could see inventories reduced here, which would also stabilize prices. Be careful what you buy, but I like it." -- Best and Worst Places to Buy a House by Danielle Babb, Entrepreneur.com, January 23, 2008.